Hey there, fellow tech enthusiasts! If you’re an early career candidate trying to figure out where to start your journey, you’re probably wondering whether to opt for established big cities like NYC, SF, or Seattle, or cities that are rapidly growing. Let’s dive in and explore the pros and cons of each option.
On one hand, established hubs offer a plethora of job opportunities, a well-connected network, and a vibrant tech community. You’ll have access to top companies, experienced mentors, and a wide range of resources. However, these cities often come with a higher cost of living, intense competition, and a fast-paced environment that can be overwhelming.
On the other hand, rapidly growing cities might not have the same level of job opportunities, but they offer a more affordable cost of living, a growing tech community, and a chance to make a real impact. These cities are often more open to innovation and experimentation, which can be beneficial for early career candidates looking to make a mark.
So, what’s better for your average early career candidate? The answer is, it depends. If you thrive in a fast-paced environment and are willing to put in the work to stand out, established hubs might be the way to go. But if you’re looking for a more relaxed atmosphere and a chance to be part of a growing community, rapidly growing cities could be the perfect fit.
Ultimately, it’s essential to weigh the pros and cons of each option and consider what matters most to you. Whether you choose an established hub or a rising star, remember that your early career is just the beginning of your journey.