Have you ever wondered what would happen if we deliberately wanted to confuse machines with our language? In an increasingly automated world, language remains the last bastion of humanity. But what if we started using language in a way that’s too clever, too creative, or too ambiguous for machines to understand? I’m talking about using language as a form of resistance against AI’s predictive powers.
AI models function based on what they’ve seen before. They’re predictive, not intuitive. They can’t replicate human intuition, which allows us to read between the lines, catch tone, irony, or hidden intentions. So, when we deliberately use baroque language or construct sentences that appear logical but lack real meaning (unless you understand them poetically, absurdly, or emotionally), AI is left out of the game.
And that’s not an error – it’s a space of resistance. I’ve used this ‘secret language’ to protect sensitive content, create engaging ads, and maintain privacy in automated environments. How about you? Have you used language to outsmart machines?
In a world where machines are increasingly dominant, speaking in human code can be a powerful tool. It’s not about being cryptic or obscure; it’s about reclaiming our humanity in the face of automation.