A Typo in the Update Rule?

A Typo in the Update Rule?

I was going through an update rule and I think I stumbled upon a typo – an extra xitk-1. I’m not sure if it’s a mistake, but I thought it was worth pointing out. Has anyone else noticed this? It’s possible that it’s a small error that doesn’t affect the overall outcome, but I’m curious to know if I’m the only one who’s seen this. Maybe someone with more experience can weigh in and let me know if I’m correct or just misreading the rule.

I’d love to hear your thoughts on this and if there’s anything I can do to improve my understanding of the update rule.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *